AS a coalition of leading independent and third sector providers of children's services we are deeply concerned by the threat of potential funding cuts to vital services for children across Scotland's councils.
This is a view echoed most recently by the Educational Institute of Scotland ("Union raises concerns over lack of qualified teachers in nurseries", The Herald, January 30). In this context we have recently launched a national petition, available to view and sign on the Scottish Parliament website, calling upon the Scottish Government to ensure Scotland's councils protect vital children's services when setting their future budgets. Demands on children's services are at their highest since 1981, with the latest figures indicating that 16,248 children are looked after by councils. On top of this there has been an 89% increase in the number of children with additional support needs in Scotland since 2010, with figures now standing at 118,034. These increases are set against a backdrop of council cuts and the UK Government threatening £25bn of more cuts to come.
Councils are being required to achieve more with less and this serves only to increase the barriers that children's services departments face in delivering the best outcomes for vulnerable young people. A society should be judged by how it treats its most vulnerable citizens and for councils to cut children's services should not be an option.
The Scottish Children's Services Coalition comprising: Tom McGhee, Managing Director, Spark of Genius;
Duncan Dunlop, Chief Executive, Who Cares? Scotland;
Stuart Jacob, Director, Falkland House School;
Sophie Dow, Founder, Mindroom;
Sophie Pilgrim, Director, Kindred,
c/o 13 Hill Street, Edinburgh.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article