News RSS Feed


Solicitor warning over Facebook flirting

3:20pm Wednesday 5th March 2008

comment Comments (7)   Have your say »

Photograph of the Author By David Watkinson »

SOCIAL networking sites will become the next tool to be used in divorce proceedings, according to an East Lancashire solicitors.

And Antonia Love, head of family law and partner at Farleys, which has branches in Blackburn, Burnley and Acrington, said that the first "Facebook divorce" is not far away.

She said: "People who use social networking websites to send flirtatious emails to people, who are not their partners, are often lulled into a false sense of security that they are doing nothing wrong because correspondence is electronic and therefore isn't real life'.

"However, even if a physical relationship doesn't occur, electronic communications such as flirtatious emails and conversations can be used in divorce proceedings with the aggrieved party, understandably, citing unreasonable behaviour."

Currently over 13.7 million people regularly use social networking sites, such as Facebook, MySpace and Bebo, in the UK to make new friends, catch up with existing ones and find old ones.

Antonia added: "Conversations that you believed to be harmless, as your partner was never going to see them, can become very harmful to you if brought up in the divorce court.

"It is probable that electronic evidence will not lead to a huge rise in divorce figures but it may certainly make a lawyer's job easier as people are a lot less careful about what they write in emails than what they write down on paper."

In a recent case involving social networking sites a man, from Newport Pagnell, near Milton Keynes, who had been ordered by magistrates not to contact his estranged wife was jailed for 10 days when he joined Facebook and an automatic "friend request" was sent to everyone on his email contact list, including his ex-wife.

A spokesman for Relate, the counselling service, said that because social networking sites are a new phenomenon it is too early to judge whether they are a problem.


Your Say YourTelegraph

Any Justice, Out there says...
6:12pm Wed 5 Mar 08

What the Parasites (Solicitors) are hoping for is they can stir up Hornets Nest's so to become a bit more richer out of other peoples misery. Solicitors are in my opinion legalised robbers due to the charges they charge people.

Jay, gotta get outta here says...
6:23pm Wed 5 Mar 08

Exactly. If they aren't getting people to 'spy' on wives/husbands/boy/g
irlfriens getting their hair cut with a little help from their 'hair technician' they find another way to make more money.

And, yes, I AM being serious about the haircut thing. So, anyone who opens up with 'idle gossip' in that chair next time ... it may not be so 'idle' to some. Solicitors have paid for a long time to get info by this underhanded way.

Why change the habit of a lifetime?

Joseph Yossarian, London says...
8:27am Thu 6 Mar 08

I feel a new facebook group coming on:

"Lawyers are Parasites and divorce lawyers are lower than whale poo"


Ann Marie, Newark DE says...
8:36pm Thu 6 Mar 08

Electronic infidelity is a big cause for divorce right now, I couldn't agree more. Especially with the advances in technology, social networks are definitely a great place for this to happen but also advances in technology make it easier for a suspicious spouse to see what your internet doings are. I work for www.firstwivesworld.
com, it is an online community for women navigating through the various stages of divorce and life thereafter. We have had several articles and blogs on electronis evidence and spyware, check them out at
http://www.firstwive
sworld.com/search/no
de/spyware
Just my two cents
Ann Marie

Respondent, Burnley County Court says...
11:19pm Thu 6 Mar 08

My wife has cited Facebook in our divorce, but not alleging infidelity. She is alleging addiction. Facebook is a tool used to communicate with friends, so alleging addiction to it is a bit like alleging addiction to a telephone. If you enjoy a good natter with your friends, why not?

I agree with the other posters that solicitors are parasite scum who need surgically removing from the planet. They attempt to wind up the other party to make the case more complicated and thus boost their fees. They also drag things out and appear less competent and answering the basic questions on the forms than your average ten year-old.

If you're getting divorced, do it yourself and save both parties a lot of pain and money.

Respondent, Burnley County Court says...
11:30pm Thu 6 Mar 08

Oh - another thing. Before you go sneaking a peek at your partner's emails to see what little nuggets you can find ... a word of caution. The suggestions of the lawyers in this article may land you in a bit of bother.

Accessing someone else's emails without permission is a ciminal offence under the Computer Misuse Act 1990. This doesn't apply if you've posted the messages to a public place, such as a Facebook Wall, but it does apply to, say, Hotmail. It could also be argued that snooping on your partner's text messages is illegal for the same reason, but your case would rely on arguing that a mobile 'phone is in effect a computer, which is not unreasonable.

So, if your partner has evidence on you gathered this way, do be sure to get them locked up, won't you?

Dave, Accrington says...
8:35pm Fri 7 Mar 08

Respondent wrote:
Oh - another thing. Before you go sneaking a peek at your partner's emails to see what little nuggets you can find ... a word of caution. The suggestions of the lawyers in this article may land you in a bit of bother. Accessing someone else's emails without permission is a ciminal offence under the Computer Misuse Act 1990. This doesn't apply if you've posted the messages to a public place, such as a Facebook Wall, but it does apply to, say, Hotmail. It could also be argued that snooping on your partner's text messages is illegal for the same reason, but your case would rely on arguing that a mobile 'phone is in effect a computer, which is not unreasonable. So, if your partner has evidence on you gathered this way, do be sure to get them locked up, won't you?
But apparently it is legal for local authorities and several hundred other public bodies to access your "private" communications. Who doesnt have a neighbour or a relative working for the council or some other public body? Thanks to legislation that went through quietly any semblance of privacy is a thing of the past. To those who say well I have nothing to hide perhaps they wouldnt mind leaving a spare house key with the council so that council workers can nip up and have a root round every so often? The pretext for this lack of privacy is that it helps the council catch fly tippers and benefit cheats. I am sure the Stasi would have said something similar. Whenever you are communicating with anyone (apart from face to face) it's safe to assume someone may be recording the fact that includes ,text, phone conversation. e-mails. Oh and websites visited.

Your sayYourTelegraph

comment Add your comment

Register for a FREE Blackburn Citizen account and you can have your say on today's news and sport by adding comments on articles we publish. The best comments may even get published in the paper.

Please register now or sign in below to continue.




Forgotten your password?
WARNING: Antonia Love says comments posted on to social networking websites such as Facebook or Bebo could be used as evidence WARNING: Antonia Love says comments posted on to social networking websites such as Facebook or Bebo could be used as evidence

Hot Jobs


Local Advertisers


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »