Bid fails to stop new Darwen homes plan (From Blackburn Citizen)
When news happens, text LT and your photos and videos to 80360. Or contact us by email or phone.
Bid fails to stop new Darwen homes plan
1:00pm Saturday 23rd March 2013 in Darwen
By Bill Jacobs, Local government reporter
SUDELL councillor Paul Browne has failed in a one-man last-ditch bid to scupper a controversial 133-home development between Pole Lane and Spring Meadows, Darwen.
The Liberal Democrat tried to persuade this week’s meeting of borough planners to withdraw permission for the scheme because a deadline to sign paperwork had been missed by the landowners.
But his colleagues ignored his plea and extended the time limit for the completion of agreements to pay more than £100,000 towards off-site affordable housing and public transport improvements from March 25 to June 25.
Coun Browne was the only committee member to vote against the extension but extracted a promise from chairman Jim Smith and borough regeneration chief Dave Harling that if the new deadline was missed, the permission would be withdrawn.
The proposed development, now part of Blackburn with Darwen Council’s ambitious plans to build up to 4,000 rural executive homes on the outskirts of the borough, has been a persistent cause of controversy.
Originally rejected by the committee and a government inspector in 2011, it was approved in December with a deadline for the Section 106 agreements to be signed this month and a two-year timetable for completion.
Coun Browne told the committee: “This development is unnecessary and there is no point in setting a deadline to sign agreements if it is missed.”
Coun Harling said: “This is a technical matter concerned with the number of landowners needing to sign the agreements.”
Tory planning spokesman Alan Cottam expressed concerns about delays and possible ‘landbanking’ of the site.
Coun Browne said after the meeting: “I wanted to stop this scheme. We do not need it. I was disappointed I was the only councillor to vote against.
“If they miss it again, I expect the committee to rescind the planning permission as promised.”
Darwen town councillor Simon Hugill said: “The deadline should have been met. It makes the committee look silly.”
Paul Sedgwick, agent for developer Ruttle Plant Holdings, said: “This is simply a technical matter. I hope the agreements will be signed by June and the development completed with- in the two-year-timetable.”
Comments(9)
JohnR1
says...
3:15pm Sat 23 Mar 13
phil kernot
says...
4:01pm Sat 23 Mar 13
JohnR1 wrote:Round about would be better and yes thay have to pay to get planning to go through , why does the railway bridge need widening lol
Are the developers going to pay for traffic lights at the pole lane/sough rd crossroads and widening of the railway bridges?
phil kernot
says...
4:09pm Sat 23 Mar 13
english rose 1
says...
7:34pm Sat 23 Mar 13
*
Political posturing of the worst kind - typical Lib-Dem.
johndarwen
says...
8:54pm Sat 23 Mar 13
JohnR1
says...
11:43pm Sat 23 Mar 13
phil kernot wrote:The increased volume of traffic in Watery Lane will mean more occurrences of 2 vehicles approaching the bridge from opposite ends. Since the average driver round here finds it too difficult to stay on their side of the centre line when crossing said bridge, it will lead to more accidents or one side having to stop behind some numpty who has no idea how wide their car is!
JohnR1 wrote:Round about would be better and yes thay have to pay to get planning to go through , why does the railway bridge need widening lol
Are the developers going to pay for traffic lights at the pole lane/sough rd crossroads and widening of the railway bridges?
english rose 1
says...
4:54pm Sun 24 Mar 13
johndarwen wrote:Whilst I don't disagree with your comments about the traffic up Shad / Roman Rd etc this is mainly because more and more folk are getting (and using) vehicles. Car ownership is rising at about 1% per year, altho' this has slowed a bit during the recession. Congestion will only get worse the more cars that are on the road.
I do hope that they upgrage all the roads to duel carrageways, other wise all them new people who buy these houses will only be able to commute to work. Look at the traffice up shad from 3pm -6pm, what a nighmare. Roman road will not take the presure of high volume every day. Who ever did the traffic review must have been drunk to think that no impact will happen. Bet it was Capita who did the review!!!
*
Unfortunately Capita cannot stop folk buying cars and using them !
jokeplans
says...
9:06pm Tue 26 Mar 13
Who are the people hoping to build this mini toytown on unsuitable land ? Bob the builder !!!
Overseen by comics in offices. I look forward to June, no cash again and the planning permission taken away ! Result !!! The only thing to sort out then will be slowing down the mindless idiots that race up Pole Lane at 40+ mph !
35yearSurrenderMonkeys says...
3:12pm Sat 23 Mar 13
But us simple Darreners fail to see the beauty. Can we not flatten this hideous carbuncle first