A GROUP of residents in Edinburgh's New Town have won a two-year
battle with Edinburgh District Council's planning committee.
The residents in Northumberland Street and Dundas Street took
exception to the construction of an aluminium flue on the outside back
wall of an A listed building occupied by the Royal Scots Club in
Abercromby Place. The flue was put up after the club was given planning
permission in November 1990 for change of use of the property from a
club to a hotel.
Mr Robert Peggie, the local government ombudsman, has found the
council guilty of maladministration because it failed to impose a
condition on the club to provide an internal ventilation system for the
kitchen.
He said that the external flue was not appropriate for the listed
building in a conservation area. The council's failure constituted
maladministration, which had caused injustice to the residents.
Mr Peggie said the council should apologise to people living in the
area and contribute #250 to their expenses incurred since early 1991.
He asked the council to explore ''all practical options for reducing
the adverse effects of the ventilation system'' and be prepared to bear
full costs.
Councillor Bob Cairns, convener, said the council's planning committee
would give close consideration to the ombudsman's conclusions.
Mr Alistair Anderson, chairman of the Northumberland Street Residents'
Association, said: ''We are very pleased with the decision.''
Mr Brian Adair, chairman of the trustees of the Royal Scots Club, said
the club had done what the planning authority had asked and had also
spent a great deal of money to meet complaints from neighbours.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article