PEOPLE should move to cities in Scotland and the north of England where water supplies are more plentiful than the south, a government minister said yesterday.
Environment Minister Lord Rooker suggested population movements are a better way of easing the water crisis in London and the south-east of England.
He said it was "immoral" to suggest moving large amounts of water to the south of the UK to ease restrictions in the drought stricken south-east.
Lord Rooker said he thought the water resources and population in the UK are "spread very unevenly" and told the House of Lords: "There is something immoral about taking a resource from other areas of the country to the southeast.
"Rather than build a water grid, it would be much better to move the population and centres of government and reconfigure the country more fairly to where there are resources."
However, Lord Rooker criticised current metering levels as "pathetic" and urged water companies to use their powers to force homebuyers to have meters installed.
He stressed at the current rate it would take more than 20 years for two-thirds of households to be metered.
Meanwhile, UK water companies are urged today to reuse more effluent as drinking water as a solution to the water shortage.
The call for action comes from the Institution of Civil Engineers.
John Lawson, ICE's Water Board chairman, said: "Parts of the UK are experiencing longterm water shortages, so we need a range of solutions to keep the water running.
"Effluent water re-use is still a relatively untapped way of providing drinking water to meet growing long-term needs."
Turning effluent into drinking water involves processes which sieve and chemically clean the liquid.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article